>KenPisano wrote:
>
>>>> I have never paid a single dime for pussy.
>>>> It has always been freely offered to me.
>>>As it should be. Sex is a mutually beneficial exchange.
>> Yep. I have always thought of it as a pleasure *shared*.
>> But damn, Bayvee . . .
>> You still make it sound like some kind of a transaction!
>
>Actually, it is.
>
> "But anyway, sex should be a non-zero-sum game, one where nobody loses,
>and everyone has fun, both win and both profit. Good sex is a
>transaction, a trade just as much as if you were buying a VCR or DVD
>player in Costco, BJ's, Tweeter, Circuit City or Best Buy. You give
>them cash, they give you the merch. Someone once said that men and
>women have two different objectives in sex. Men give women love and get
>sex, and the corollary, women give sex and get love. The man gives the
>woman love in exchange for the pleasure of sex he gets from her. The
>woman gets the contact, the attention and the interest of the man in
>exchange for the sex she gives him. I say it that way because while I
>do believe a woman is entitled to orgasm as much or more than a man,
>some women on earth claim that even if they don't come, they do like all
>the rest of the experience. Some even go so far as to say that climax
>and orgasm are icing on the cake. While I would hope that a woman would
>make that as rare as possible, she deserves orgasms as much as she can
>get them..."
> - Supervisor 246 in Paul Robinson's
> "In the Matter of: Instrument of God"

I'm sorry, but I deserve far more orgasms than she does.